Clarifying User Intent I need to be careful since the user made a statement rather than asking a question. I can ask if they want me to look something up or if they're looking for a summary or context about their statement. It's important to clarify what they mean, especially regarding events like the FIFA World Cup draw or the FIFA Peace Award. Also, since my knowledge is limited, I should mention that I don't have any updates on that event.Responding with Clarity To respond effectively, I should clarify what the user needs. I can offer to verify via a web search while providing general context about FIFA awards, like the previous "FIFA Presidential Award." I want to keep it concise and suggest options for them: 1) a quick fact-check, 2) a summary of events and controversies, or 3) just the draw results and their implications. It's important to check with the user before proceeding with any web search!Crafting a Response I want to clarify that as of my knowledge cutoff in October 2024, there wasn’t a FIFA Peace Prize, so I’d need to verify that information. I should also remind the user to be cautious about fake news. I plan to craft a concise response in Chinese, including a couple of bullet point options for clarity. It’s important to keep everything in plain text and avoid unnecessary commands for now, focusing on getting clarification first.
这听起来像爆料/热点，但我这边的知识截止在 2024-10，当时并没有“FIFA 首届和平奖”这类官方奖项，更别说颁给特朗普。也没有与世界杯抽签挂钩的类似安排。要么是新近发生、要么是标题党/讹传。
需要我帮你进一步查证并总结吗？你选一个：
- 事实核查：快速确认真伪并给出权威来源
- 懒人包：如果为真，梳理时间线、争议点、对抽签/赛程的影响
- 只看抽签：不管奖项，直接汇总这次世界杯抽签结果与分组看点
如果有原始链接或截图，也可以贴一下，我先做源头核验。